I find Osceleton more usefully and flexible and doesn't require Max4live. Infuse some of your QC visual work with it though (although i'm sure its your next step).ĭon't know if you noticed but i'm not using synapse as its a little bit more CPU intensive and single user only. Yes dustin i love it :) the audio is just fantastic, a real cinematic dub sound! Good to see you playing around with this. literally the backing track was made in 5 mins. The track i made on my iPad with garage band ? freakin sweet I'm telling you. I'm thinking about doing something like this for xyz for both hands that should give me 6 instruments i can control with two hands. also i am using z depth to trigger the notes.
Osculator license Patch#
maybe someone can make sense of this patch its a bit messy that is why this is in developing comps and no the repo.īasically its a qc patch sending out hits to osculator for x and y of left and right hand. right now its just a left and right hand kaosilator type of patch. I couldn't get the cool synapse max 4 live mappers to work i think my ableton is a bit outdated so i used synapse for quartz composer and osculator to send data to live. What conclusion to draw of this? Retailers can easily make something seem a better value simply by placing it next to an exorbitantly priced product in a store, on the web, or in a catalog.Some gladly pointed the synapse app in a thread here so I'm returning the favor with a synapse patch. Even more interesting was the fact that most consumers did not realize that the incidental prices of sweatshirts were having any impact on their behavior. Beach-goers were willing to pay only $7.29 for the CDs when they were next to $10 sweatshirts, but their willingness-to-pay jumped almost 18%, to $9, when the same sweatshirts cost $80. In one influential study conducted by consumer researchers Joe Nunes and Peter Boatwright, these authors sold popular music CDs (this study is a few years old) next to sweatshirts that were alternately priced either at $10 or $80 (at every half hour interval) on a popular boardwalk. Any encountered price - even that of an entirely unrelated product - can have an effect. Such prices don’t have to be for the same product. This applies to external reference prices as well. Because of this uncertainty, they can be influenced by arbitrary information. Whether they are in a store or online, shoppers are inherently uncertain about the value of items they are browsing or considering for purchase.
#3: Prices of unrelated products also affect evaluations. External reference prices are likely to mislead and indicate something is of a better value than it really is. The upside of providing an external price is clear for marketers: for shoppers, the story is murkier. This result can explain many of the ridiculous claims of sales and mark-downs we see all the time.
Even when the reference price that the marketer provides is completely implausible (the store claims that the can of tomato sauce should cost $10.00, but it only costs a $1.00 today), it will still make shoppers evaluate the tomato sauce positively. Research shows that consumers evaluate the tomato sauce as having better quality and as a better deal at $1.00 in the second case. Let’s take two cases, a supermarket sign which has no reference price (it simply says that a can of tomato sauce costs $1.00) and another sign which includes a reference price (it says this can of tomato sauce should cost $2.00, but it’s on sale today for $1.00).
#1: Any external reference price supplied by a marketer, even an exaggerated one, has a positive effect on shopper evaluations.
0 kommentar(er)
